Review



il 6 antibody  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Proteintech il 6 antibody
    Il 6 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1082 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pmc12972744-497-1-6?v=Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1082 article reviews
    il 6 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Bioss anti il 6
    Anti Il 6, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pmc12992974-282-17-19?v=Bioss
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti il 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    NSJ Bioreagents il-6 antibody
    Il 6 Antibody, supplied by NSJ Bioreagents, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/nsj+bioreagents___v2346?v=NSJ+Bioreagents
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    il-6 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech il 6 antibody
    Il 6 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pmc12972744-497-1-6?v=Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    il 6 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Affinity Biosciences ith primary antibodies against il 6
    Ith Primary Antibodies Against Il 6, supplied by Affinity Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pm42095523-535-25-31?v=Affinity+Biosciences
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ith primary antibodies against il 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    l 6  (Bioss)
    95
    Bioss l 6
    L 6, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pm42080342-272-16-17?v=Bioss
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    l 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss primary antibodies against il 6
    JGF inhibits NO, <t>IL-6,</t> and TNF-α production in RAW264.7 and MH-S cells. The cells were treated with JGF (50, 100, 150, 300, 600 μg/mL), 2-E (0.1 μM), DXT (10 μM), or LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. ( A ) Cell viability was evaluated using crystal violet. ( B ) NO production was measured using the Griess assay. ( C-D ) IL-6 ( C ) and TNF-α ( D ) levels were determined by ELISA. EC 50 was calculated by CompuSyn software. Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for groups (n = 3). Significant differences are denoted as ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
    Primary Antibodies Against Il 6, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pmc13083715-109-0-4?v=Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against il 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Affinity Biosciences il 6 antibody
    JGF inhibits NO, <t>IL-6,</t> and TNF-α production in RAW264.7 and MH-S cells. The cells were treated with JGF (50, 100, 150, 300, 600 μg/mL), 2-E (0.1 μM), DXT (10 μM), or LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. ( A ) Cell viability was evaluated using crystal violet. ( B ) NO production was measured using the Griess assay. ( C-D ) IL-6 ( C ) and TNF-α ( D ) levels were determined by ELISA. EC 50 was calculated by CompuSyn software. Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for groups (n = 3). Significant differences are denoted as ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
    Il 6 Antibody, supplied by Affinity Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pm42061006-67-1-6?v=Affinity+Biosciences
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    il 6 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    MedChemExpress elevated il 6
    JGF inhibits NO, <t>IL-6,</t> and TNF-α production in RAW264.7 and MH-S cells. The cells were treated with JGF (50, 100, 150, 300, 600 μg/mL), 2-E (0.1 μM), DXT (10 μM), or LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. ( A ) Cell viability was evaluated using crystal violet. ( B ) NO production was measured using the Griess assay. ( C-D ) IL-6 ( C ) and TNF-α ( D ) levels were determined by ELISA. EC 50 was calculated by CompuSyn software. Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for groups (n = 3). Significant differences are denoted as ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
    Elevated Il 6, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pm42043662-136-14-41?v=MedChemExpress
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elevated il 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems anti mouse il 6 neutralizing antibody
    NAD + supplementation suppresses cGAS/STING pathway activation in cerebral endothelial cells of APP/PS1 mice. (A) Heatmap of differentially expressed key cGAS/STING pathway‐related genes (such as Cgas , Sting1 , Irf3 ) identified by RNA‐seq of cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice ( n = 3 per group). (B, C) Representative western blot image (B) and densitometric quantification of cGAS, STING, phospho‐TBK1 Ser172 (p‐TBK1), and phospho‐IRF3 Ser396 (p‐IRF3) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPwt, APPtg, and APPtg + NR mice (C; n = 6 per group). (D–G) Representative immunofluorescence images of hippocampus and cortex from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice showing CD31 (green) co‐stained with STING (D, red) or cGAS (F, red); quantification of STING (E) and cGAS (G) fluorescence intensity within CD31 + cerebral vessels were shown ( n = 5 or 6 mice per group); nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (H) qPCR analysis of SASP genes <t>(</t> <t>Il6</t> , Tnf , Il1b , Cxcl10 , Cxcl2 ) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice ( n = 5 per group). (I) ELISA quantification of IL‐6, TNF‐α, and IL‐1β in the culture supernatants of bEnd.3 endothelial cells treated with vehicle control, NR, Aβ, or Aβ + NR ( n = 6 per group). (J) SA‐β‐galactosidase staining of bEnd.3 endothelial cells transfected with control siRNA (si‐Ctrl), Cgas siRNA (si‐ Cgas ), or Sting1 siRNA (si‐ Sting ) followed by Aβ stimulation or vehicle control; representative images show SA‐β‐gal + cells indicated by white arrows, with enlarged insets provided; the percentage of SA‐β‐gal + cells were quantified ( n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (C, E, G, I, J) or unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test (H). p ‐values are indicated in the figure.
    Anti Mouse Il 6 Neutralizing Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+antibody/pmc13109647-61-11-16?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse il 6 neutralizing antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    JGF inhibits NO, IL-6, and TNF-α production in RAW264.7 and MH-S cells. The cells were treated with JGF (50, 100, 150, 300, 600 μg/mL), 2-E (0.1 μM), DXT (10 μM), or LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. ( A ) Cell viability was evaluated using crystal violet. ( B ) NO production was measured using the Griess assay. ( C-D ) IL-6 ( C ) and TNF-α ( D ) levels were determined by ELISA. EC 50 was calculated by CompuSyn software. Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for groups (n = 3). Significant differences are denoted as ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Journal: Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine

    Article Title: Chemical characterization of Jing Guan Fang and its application in alleviating coronavirus envelope protein-induced proinflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo

    doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2025.12.003

    Figure Lengend Snippet: JGF inhibits NO, IL-6, and TNF-α production in RAW264.7 and MH-S cells. The cells were treated with JGF (50, 100, 150, 300, 600 μg/mL), 2-E (0.1 μM), DXT (10 μM), or LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h. ( A ) Cell viability was evaluated using crystal violet. ( B ) NO production was measured using the Griess assay. ( C-D ) IL-6 ( C ) and TNF-α ( D ) levels were determined by ELISA. EC 50 was calculated by CompuSyn software. Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for groups (n = 3). Significant differences are denoted as ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against IL-6 (Bioss, BS0379R, 1:500), TNF-α (Bioworld, BS1857, 1:300), and IL-1β (Bioss, BS6319R, 1:500) were applied overnight at room temperature.

    Techniques: Griess Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Software, Standard Deviation

    Components of JGF inhibit 2-E-induced inflammation. The RAW264.7 and MH-S cells were co-treated with JGF compounds and 2-E for 24 h. ( A ) The 3D-HPLC fingerprint of JGF. Compound structures were sourced from the PubChem database. The detection wavelength ranged from 200 to 400 nm, and the injection volume was 20 μL. ( B ) Cell viability was evaluated using crystal violet. ( C ) NO production was measured using the Griess assay. ( D-E ) IL-6 ( D ) and TNF-α ( E ) levels were determined by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined relative to the 2-E group. Significant differences are denoted as ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Journal: Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine

    Article Title: Chemical characterization of Jing Guan Fang and its application in alleviating coronavirus envelope protein-induced proinflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo

    doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2025.12.003

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Components of JGF inhibit 2-E-induced inflammation. The RAW264.7 and MH-S cells were co-treated with JGF compounds and 2-E for 24 h. ( A ) The 3D-HPLC fingerprint of JGF. Compound structures were sourced from the PubChem database. The detection wavelength ranged from 200 to 400 nm, and the injection volume was 20 μL. ( B ) Cell viability was evaluated using crystal violet. ( C ) NO production was measured using the Griess assay. ( D-E ) IL-6 ( D ) and TNF-α ( E ) levels were determined by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined relative to the 2-E group. Significant differences are denoted as ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against IL-6 (Bioss, BS0379R, 1:500), TNF-α (Bioworld, BS1857, 1:300), and IL-1β (Bioss, BS6319R, 1:500) were applied overnight at room temperature.

    Techniques: Injection, Griess Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    JGF reduces the 2-E-induced proinflammatory cytokines in vivo . ( A ) The experimental scheme for mouse exposure. ( B-F ) Levels of IL-6 ( B ), TNF-α ( C ), IFN-γ ( D ), IL-1β ( E ), and IL-12 ( F ) in lung tissue and serum were measured by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9 for serum, except DXT group n = 6; n = 6 for lung tissue, except DXT group n = 3) ( G ) Representative histological images of lung tissue stained with H&E and IHC images for IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β expression. ( H-J ) Quantification of IL-6 ( H ), TNF-α ( I ), and IL-1β ( J ) positive areas using ImageJ (n = 3). Significant differences between the control (CTL) group and other groups are denoted by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Significant differences between the 2-E group and 2-E + JGF group are indicated by #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001.

    Journal: Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine

    Article Title: Chemical characterization of Jing Guan Fang and its application in alleviating coronavirus envelope protein-induced proinflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo

    doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2025.12.003

    Figure Lengend Snippet: JGF reduces the 2-E-induced proinflammatory cytokines in vivo . ( A ) The experimental scheme for mouse exposure. ( B-F ) Levels of IL-6 ( B ), TNF-α ( C ), IFN-γ ( D ), IL-1β ( E ), and IL-12 ( F ) in lung tissue and serum were measured by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9 for serum, except DXT group n = 6; n = 6 for lung tissue, except DXT group n = 3) ( G ) Representative histological images of lung tissue stained with H&E and IHC images for IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β expression. ( H-J ) Quantification of IL-6 ( H ), TNF-α ( I ), and IL-1β ( J ) positive areas using ImageJ (n = 3). Significant differences between the control (CTL) group and other groups are denoted by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Significant differences between the 2-E group and 2-E + JGF group are indicated by #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against IL-6 (Bioss, BS0379R, 1:500), TNF-α (Bioworld, BS1857, 1:300), and IL-1β (Bioss, BS6319R, 1:500) were applied overnight at room temperature.

    Techniques: In Vivo, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining, Expressing, Control

    NAD + supplementation suppresses cGAS/STING pathway activation in cerebral endothelial cells of APP/PS1 mice. (A) Heatmap of differentially expressed key cGAS/STING pathway‐related genes (such as Cgas , Sting1 , Irf3 ) identified by RNA‐seq of cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice ( n = 3 per group). (B, C) Representative western blot image (B) and densitometric quantification of cGAS, STING, phospho‐TBK1 Ser172 (p‐TBK1), and phospho‐IRF3 Ser396 (p‐IRF3) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPwt, APPtg, and APPtg + NR mice (C; n = 6 per group). (D–G) Representative immunofluorescence images of hippocampus and cortex from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice showing CD31 (green) co‐stained with STING (D, red) or cGAS (F, red); quantification of STING (E) and cGAS (G) fluorescence intensity within CD31 + cerebral vessels were shown ( n = 5 or 6 mice per group); nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (H) qPCR analysis of SASP genes ( Il6 , Tnf , Il1b , Cxcl10 , Cxcl2 ) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice ( n = 5 per group). (I) ELISA quantification of IL‐6, TNF‐α, and IL‐1β in the culture supernatants of bEnd.3 endothelial cells treated with vehicle control, NR, Aβ, or Aβ + NR ( n = 6 per group). (J) SA‐β‐galactosidase staining of bEnd.3 endothelial cells transfected with control siRNA (si‐Ctrl), Cgas siRNA (si‐ Cgas ), or Sting1 siRNA (si‐ Sting ) followed by Aβ stimulation or vehicle control; representative images show SA‐β‐gal + cells indicated by white arrows, with enlarged insets provided; the percentage of SA‐β‐gal + cells were quantified ( n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (C, E, G, I, J) or unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test (H). p ‐values are indicated in the figure.

    Journal: Alzheimer's & Dementia

    Article Title: Endothelial NAD + depletion drives vascular senescence and neuroinflammation via mtDNA‐cGAS/STING‐CD38 signaling in Alzheimer's disease

    doi: 10.1002/alz.71423

    Figure Lengend Snippet: NAD + supplementation suppresses cGAS/STING pathway activation in cerebral endothelial cells of APP/PS1 mice. (A) Heatmap of differentially expressed key cGAS/STING pathway‐related genes (such as Cgas , Sting1 , Irf3 ) identified by RNA‐seq of cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice ( n = 3 per group). (B, C) Representative western blot image (B) and densitometric quantification of cGAS, STING, phospho‐TBK1 Ser172 (p‐TBK1), and phospho‐IRF3 Ser396 (p‐IRF3) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPwt, APPtg, and APPtg + NR mice (C; n = 6 per group). (D–G) Representative immunofluorescence images of hippocampus and cortex from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice showing CD31 (green) co‐stained with STING (D, red) or cGAS (F, red); quantification of STING (E) and cGAS (G) fluorescence intensity within CD31 + cerebral vessels were shown ( n = 5 or 6 mice per group); nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (H) qPCR analysis of SASP genes ( Il6 , Tnf , Il1b , Cxcl10 , Cxcl2 ) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions from APPtg and APPtg + NR mice ( n = 5 per group). (I) ELISA quantification of IL‐6, TNF‐α, and IL‐1β in the culture supernatants of bEnd.3 endothelial cells treated with vehicle control, NR, Aβ, or Aβ + NR ( n = 6 per group). (J) SA‐β‐galactosidase staining of bEnd.3 endothelial cells transfected with control siRNA (si‐Ctrl), Cgas siRNA (si‐ Cgas ), or Sting1 siRNA (si‐ Sting ) followed by Aβ stimulation or vehicle control; representative images show SA‐β‐gal + cells indicated by white arrows, with enlarged insets provided; the percentage of SA‐β‐gal + cells were quantified ( n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (C, E, G, I, J) or unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test (H). p ‐values are indicated in the figure.

    Article Snippet: For IL‐6 pathway analysis, BV‐2 microglia were incubated with 10 ng/ml anti‐mouse IL‐6 neutralizing antibody (α‐IL‐6; R&D systems, #MAB406) or anti‐mouse IL‐6Rα blocking antibody (α‐IL‐6R; R&D systems, #AF1830) in CM‐containing medium from bEnd.3 cultures.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, RNA Sequencing, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control, Transfection, Two Tailed Test

    NAD + supplementation suppresses cGAS/STING activation by enhancing mitochondrial function and preventing cytosolic mtDNA leakage. (A) Quantification of mitochondrial membrane potential using JC‐1 staining in bEnd.3 endothelial cells treated with Aβ, Aβ + NR, or control conditions; representative images are shown in Figure ( n = 5 per group). (B, C) Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular ROS levels in bEnd.3 cells under indicated treatments ( n = 4 per group). (D) qPCR quantification of cytosolic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA; D‐loop , Non‐Numt , Cox1 ) and nuclear DNA (nDNA; Tert , B2m ) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions isolated from APPwt, APPwt + NR, APPtg, and APPtg + NR mice ( n ≥5 per group). (E, F) Representative immunofluorescence images (E) and quantification (F) of co‐localization of CD31 (green) and oxidative DNA damage marker 8‐OHdG (red) in hippocampal and cortex of APPtg and APPtg + NR mice; nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue) ( n ≥5 mice per group). (G) Quantification of cytosolic mtDNA and nDNA levels in bEnd.3 cells transfected with siRNA targeting control (si‐Ctrl), Cgas (si‐ Cgas ), or Sting1 (si‐ Sting ) followed by Aβ treatment ( n = 4 per group). (H) Quantification of cytosolic mtDNA and nDNA levels in bEnd.3 cells treated with Aβ, Aβ + mtDNA depletion (ddC), or Aβ + ddC + NR ( n = 4 per group). (I) Relative mRNA expression of SASP‐related cytokines (IL‐6, TNF‐α, IL‐1β, CXCL10, CXCL2) under the same treatment conditions as in (H) ( n = 4 per group). (J, K) Western blot analysis (J) and quantification (K) of cGAS/STING pathway components (cGAS, STING, p‐TBK1, p‐IRF3) and tight junction proteins (ZO‐1, Occludin) in bEnd.3 cells under treatments with Aβ, Aβ + ddC, and Aβ + ddC + NR ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. P ‐values are indicated in the figure.

    Journal: Alzheimer's & Dementia

    Article Title: Endothelial NAD + depletion drives vascular senescence and neuroinflammation via mtDNA‐cGAS/STING‐CD38 signaling in Alzheimer's disease

    doi: 10.1002/alz.71423

    Figure Lengend Snippet: NAD + supplementation suppresses cGAS/STING activation by enhancing mitochondrial function and preventing cytosolic mtDNA leakage. (A) Quantification of mitochondrial membrane potential using JC‐1 staining in bEnd.3 endothelial cells treated with Aβ, Aβ + NR, or control conditions; representative images are shown in Figure ( n = 5 per group). (B, C) Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular ROS levels in bEnd.3 cells under indicated treatments ( n = 4 per group). (D) qPCR quantification of cytosolic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA; D‐loop , Non‐Numt , Cox1 ) and nuclear DNA (nDNA; Tert , B2m ) in cerebral vessel‐enriched fractions isolated from APPwt, APPwt + NR, APPtg, and APPtg + NR mice ( n ≥5 per group). (E, F) Representative immunofluorescence images (E) and quantification (F) of co‐localization of CD31 (green) and oxidative DNA damage marker 8‐OHdG (red) in hippocampal and cortex of APPtg and APPtg + NR mice; nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue) ( n ≥5 mice per group). (G) Quantification of cytosolic mtDNA and nDNA levels in bEnd.3 cells transfected with siRNA targeting control (si‐Ctrl), Cgas (si‐ Cgas ), or Sting1 (si‐ Sting ) followed by Aβ treatment ( n = 4 per group). (H) Quantification of cytosolic mtDNA and nDNA levels in bEnd.3 cells treated with Aβ, Aβ + mtDNA depletion (ddC), or Aβ + ddC + NR ( n = 4 per group). (I) Relative mRNA expression of SASP‐related cytokines (IL‐6, TNF‐α, IL‐1β, CXCL10, CXCL2) under the same treatment conditions as in (H) ( n = 4 per group). (J, K) Western blot analysis (J) and quantification (K) of cGAS/STING pathway components (cGAS, STING, p‐TBK1, p‐IRF3) and tight junction proteins (ZO‐1, Occludin) in bEnd.3 cells under treatments with Aβ, Aβ + ddC, and Aβ + ddC + NR ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. P ‐values are indicated in the figure.

    Article Snippet: For IL‐6 pathway analysis, BV‐2 microglia were incubated with 10 ng/ml anti‐mouse IL‐6 neutralizing antibody (α‐IL‐6; R&D systems, #MAB406) or anti‐mouse IL‐6Rα blocking antibody (α‐IL‐6R; R&D systems, #AF1830) in CM‐containing medium from bEnd.3 cultures.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Membrane, Staining, Control, Isolation, Immunofluorescence, Marker, Transfection, Expressing, Western Blot

    NAD + supplementation disrupts IL‐6‐mediated endothelial‐microglial inflammatory crosstalk in AD. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing co‐staining of microglial marker Iba1 (red) and endothelial marker CD31 (green) in the cortex and hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice; white arrows indicate perivascular microglia closely associated with cerebral vessels. (B) Quantification of the proportion of perivascular microglia relative to total microglia ( n ≥ 5 per group). (C) Triple immunofluorescence staining of Iba1 (red), CD31 (green), and IL‐6R (gray) to visualize IL‐6R expression in perivascular microglia; yellow arrows indicate IL‐6R‐positive perivascular microglia. (D) Quantification of IL‐6R fluorescence intensity in vessel‐associated microglia ( n ≥5 per group). (E–F) Western blot analysis (E) and densitometric quantification (F) of IL‐6R, JAK1, and phosphorylation levels of STAT3 and NF‐κB p65 in microglia stimulated with conditioned media from bEnd.3 cells treated with vehicle (Con), NR, Aβ, or Aβ + NR ( n = 6 per group). (G–H) Western blot analysis (G) and quantification (H) of IL‐6R, JAK1, and p‐STAT3/p‐NF‐κB p65 in microglia co‐treated with Aβ‐challenged endothelial conditioned medium and isotype IgG, IL‐6‐neutralizing antibody (α‐IL‐6), or IL‐6R‐neutralizing antibody (α‐IL‐6R) ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. P ‐values are indicated in the figure.

    Journal: Alzheimer's & Dementia

    Article Title: Endothelial NAD + depletion drives vascular senescence and neuroinflammation via mtDNA‐cGAS/STING‐CD38 signaling in Alzheimer's disease

    doi: 10.1002/alz.71423

    Figure Lengend Snippet: NAD + supplementation disrupts IL‐6‐mediated endothelial‐microglial inflammatory crosstalk in AD. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing co‐staining of microglial marker Iba1 (red) and endothelial marker CD31 (green) in the cortex and hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice; white arrows indicate perivascular microglia closely associated with cerebral vessels. (B) Quantification of the proportion of perivascular microglia relative to total microglia ( n ≥ 5 per group). (C) Triple immunofluorescence staining of Iba1 (red), CD31 (green), and IL‐6R (gray) to visualize IL‐6R expression in perivascular microglia; yellow arrows indicate IL‐6R‐positive perivascular microglia. (D) Quantification of IL‐6R fluorescence intensity in vessel‐associated microglia ( n ≥5 per group). (E–F) Western blot analysis (E) and densitometric quantification (F) of IL‐6R, JAK1, and phosphorylation levels of STAT3 and NF‐κB p65 in microglia stimulated with conditioned media from bEnd.3 cells treated with vehicle (Con), NR, Aβ, or Aβ + NR ( n = 6 per group). (G–H) Western blot analysis (G) and quantification (H) of IL‐6R, JAK1, and p‐STAT3/p‐NF‐κB p65 in microglia co‐treated with Aβ‐challenged endothelial conditioned medium and isotype IgG, IL‐6‐neutralizing antibody (α‐IL‐6), or IL‐6R‐neutralizing antibody (α‐IL‐6R) ( n = 4 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. P ‐values are indicated in the figure.

    Article Snippet: For IL‐6 pathway analysis, BV‐2 microglia were incubated with 10 ng/ml anti‐mouse IL‐6 neutralizing antibody (α‐IL‐6; R&D systems, #MAB406) or anti‐mouse IL‐6Rα blocking antibody (α‐IL‐6R; R&D systems, #AF1830) in CM‐containing medium from bEnd.3 cultures.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Marker, Expressing, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics